•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This paper comprehensively reviews the classification of breast cancer histological images. The paper discusses the research objectives, methodologies used, and conclusions drawn, as well as suggestions for the future. The study is based on the ICIAR 2018 database, which is considered one of the largest databases available to support this research. The paper also addresses major challenges such as lack of data, variation in tissue preparation, class imbalance, and computational requirements. Advanced techniques such as deep learning (DL), transfer learning and data augmentation are explored, along with innovative models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs). The study focuses on integrating multimodal (histological, genetic, and clinical) data to enhance diagnostic accuracy and enable personalized treatments. Breast cancer is responsible for 25.4% of cancer cases, with 1 in every 12 women developing this fatal disease. In 2020, a large number of women died as a result of the disease spreading through lymphatic and blood vessels, with the number of deaths reaching about 685,000 cases. Improving outcomes depends greatly on early detection of the disease and providing appropriate and effective treatment. Future directions include addressing challenges related to texture image classification and promoting standardized data sets with the goal of developing diagnostic tools and treatment strategies.

Reason for Retraction

This article has been retracted at the request of the Editorial Office, following an internal investigation conducted in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines.

The investigation identified serious concerns affecting the integrity and reliability of the published work. Specifically, one or more of the following issues were confirmed:

  1. Undisclosed use of computer-generated text and/or data, in which substantial portions of the content were produced using algorithmic or artificial intelligence–based tools without transparent disclosure, contrary to the journal's authorship and transparency policies.

  2. Compromised peer-review process, indicating irregularities that undermine the validity, independence or authenticity of the review procedure.

  3. Inappropriate or misleading citations, including references that are irrelevant, improperly used, or appear to artificially inflate citation metrics, thereby distorting the scholarly record.

  4. Authorship-related concerns, including the addition of new author(s) at a later stage of the publication process without adequate justification, documentation, or transparent disclosure, raising unresolved questions regarding author contributions, responsibility, and compliance with the journal's authorship criteria.

The Editorial Office determined that these issues significantly compromise the scientific integrity of the article, and that correction alone would be insufficient to address the concerns. Retraction was therefore deemed necessary to maintain the accuracy and trustworthiness of the scholarly record.

The authors were informed of the findings and the retraction decision. While the authors do not respond to this retraction, the journal has proceeded with the retraction in line with COPE guidance, which permits retraction without author consent when editorial integrity is at risk.

This retraction is issued to alert readers that the findings and conclusions of the article should not be relied upon. The original article will remain accessible for the sake of the scholarly record, but it will be clearly marked as retracted.

Apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process.

Please see the Retraction Notice available at: https://ijcsm.researchcommons.org/ijcsm/vol6/iss1/1.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52866/2788-7421.1351

Download

Share

COinS