•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Long short-term memory networks can effectively process complex temporal patterns in electrocardiogram data. These sequential models excel at classifying heart disease from the rich signals captured by electrocardiograms. However, traditional algorithms struggle with the intricate waveforms encoded in each heartbeat. Deeper architectures such as LSTM are better equipped to untangle the subtle variations between healthy sinus rhythms and lethal arrhythmias. In this study, an LSTM model was developed to diagnose disease from the PTB dataset. The network was trained using a fusion of deep learning schemes for sequential data. The model underwent several evaluations, from a confusion matrix mapping predictions to ground truths, to numerical metrics quantifying accuracy, F1 score and memory retention over time. Qualitative insights also revealed how the system differentiated classes to improve understanding. The results showed the network could diagnose various heart conditions with up to 97.9% accuracy and was better at distinguishing patient classes than older techniques. In addition, the network excelled at detecting subtle but critical patterns in electrocardiograms, enhancing medical diagnosis for improved care.

Reason for Retraction

This article has been retracted at the request of the Editorial Office, following an internal investigation conducted in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines.

The investigation identified serious concerns affecting the integrity and reliability of the published work. Specifically, one or more of the following issues were confirmed:

  1. Undisclosed use of computer-generated text and/or data, in which substantial portions of the content were produced using algorithmic or artificial intelligence–based tools without transparent disclosure, contrary to the journal's authorship and transparency policies.

  2. Compromised peer-review process, indicating irregularities that undermine the validity, independence or authenticity of the review procedure.

  3. Inappropriate or misleading citations, including references that are irrelevant, improperly used, or appear to artificially inflate citation metrics, thereby distorting the scholarly record.

  4. Authorship-related concerns, including the addition of new author(s) at a later stage of the publication process without adequate justification, documentation, or transparent disclosure, raising unresolved questions regarding author contributions, responsibility, and compliance with the journal's authorship criteria.

The Editorial Office determined that these issues significantly compromise the scientific integrity of the article, and that correction alone would be insufficient to address the concerns. Retraction was therefore deemed necessary to maintain the accuracy and trustworthiness of the scholarly record.

The authors were informed of the findings and the retraction decision. While the authors do not respond to this retraction, the journal has proceeded with the retraction in line with COPE guidance, which permits retraction without author consent when editorial integrity is at risk.

This retraction is issued to alert readers that the findings and conclusions of the article should not be relied upon. The original article will remain accessible for the sake of the scholarly record, but it will be clearly marked as retracted.

Apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process.

Please see the Retraction Notice available at: https://ijcsm.researchcommons.org/ijcsm/vol6/iss2/18.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52866/2788-7421.1352

Download

Share

COinS