•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Hysterical conversion has similar cognition and behaviours to those in the case of ASD; it is, therefore, complex when diagnosing and classifying the condition. The majority of employed diagnostic tests are cross-sectional and fail to describe the developmental and clinical features of ASD; for this reason, they are pretty inaccurate in the diagnosis of ASD and thus cause disparities in the efficiency of the therapeutic interventions used. The present study's research contribution is a new application of deep learning that aims to analyse the spectrum of ASD with gradient-based classifications. In this case, we use a DL model trained on many traits of behaviour, cognition, and genetics because of the need to capture the idiosyncrasies of the autism spectrum. A blend of CNNs and RNNs with attention mechanisms to ensure a rich and high-dimensional representation of ASD traits is considered in this work. These representations are enhanced and diagnosed by employing the gradient-based classification algorithm to improve the categorisation for ASD and give a more detailed and accurate classification result. Suggestively pointing to the opportunities to use deep learning procedures for neurodevelopmental disorders, the results suggest that the accuracy and specificity of the diagnostic assessment for ASD are enhanced. This research creates a platform for future research that will undertake a periodic and intensive evaluation of ASD with the ultimate aim of identifying particular interventions that may help reduce the effects of ASD on the affected and enhance their standard of living.

Reason for Retraction

This article has been retracted at the request of the Editorial Office, following an internal investigation conducted in accordance with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Retraction Guidelines.

The investigation identified serious concerns affecting the integrity and reliability of the published work. Specifically, one or more of the following issues were confirmed:

  1. Undisclosed use of computer-generated text and/or data, in which substantial portions of the content were produced using algorithmic or artificial intelligence–based tools without transparent disclosure, contrary to the journal's authorship and transparency policies.

  2. Compromised peer-review process, indicating irregularities that undermine the validity, independence or authenticity of the review procedure.

  3. Inappropriate or misleading citations, including references that are irrelevant, improperly used, or appear to artificially inflate citation metrics, thereby distorting the scholarly record.

  4. Authorship-related concerns, including the addition of new author(s) at a later stage of the publication process without adequate justification, documentation, or transparent disclosure, raising unresolved questions regarding author contributions, responsibility, and compliance with the journal's authorship criteria.

The Editorial Office determined that these issues significantly compromise the scientific integrity of the article, and that correction alone would be insufficient to address the concerns. Retraction was therefore deemed necessary to maintain the accuracy and trustworthiness of the scholarly record.

The authors were informed of the findings and the retraction decision. While the authors do not respond to this retraction, the journal has proceeded with the retraction in line with COPE guidance, which permits retraction without author consent when editorial integrity is at risk.

This retraction is issued to alert readers that the findings and conclusions of the article should not be relied upon. The original article will remain accessible for the sake of the scholarly record, but it will be clearly marked as retracted.

Apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process.

Please see the Retraction Notice available at: https://ijcsm.researchcommons.org/ijcsm/vol6/iss3/16

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52866/2788-7421.1359

Download

Share

COinS